Career Comparisons: Kershaw Vs Scherzer

Arguably the two best pitchers of the last 15 years, Max Scherzer (left) and Clayton Kershaw (right)
Probable future Hall of Famers, Max Scherzer (left) and Clayton Kershaw (right)

Born four years apart. One right-handed, the other a lefty. One’s from St. Louis, one’s from Dallas, Texas. Max went to the University of Missouri. Clayton went straight to the show after high school. Scherzer’s played for a handful of clubs, Kershaw’s been a Dodger lifer. Max’s different colored eyes could get him a role as a James Bond villain, and Clayton’s childhood friend is Matthew freakin’ Stafford.

Point being, there might not be much in common between the two. Their similarities, however, have made them the most prestigious, top tier pitchers of the millennium. One similarity they share, has been being a pain in the ass to every hitter in the league since they’ve made their debuts in 2008. They both have a World Series ring on their finger. Both with three Cy Young awards on their trophy shelf at home, and more combined All-Star selections than we can count on our fingers.

But who’s better?

How do their career numbers stack up against one another? or even year by year comparisons? Is it a close margin between the two? Or is there a gap between them? Lets dive into the numbers that help distinguish between the two, and even shed light on how they’re alike, to see who really is better

Let’s start this off with a year-by-year comparison with the basic major key stats,: (Bold lettering indicates led league in statistic that season)

Clayton KershawYearMax Scherzer
5-5, 4.26 ERA, 1.49 WHIP, 107.2 IP, 100 Ks20080-4, 3.05 ERA, 1.23 WHIP, 56 IP, 66 Ks
8-8, 2.79 ERA, 1.22 WHIP, 171 IP, 185 Ks, 6.3 H/920099-11, 4.12 ERA, 1.34 WHIP, 170.1 IP, 174 Ks
13-10, 2.91 ERA, 1.17 WHIP, 204.1 IP, 212 Ks201012-11, 3.50 ERA, 1.24 WHIP, 195.2 IP, 184 Ks
21-5, 2.28 ERA, 0.97 WHIP, 233.1 IP, 248 Ks, 6.7 H/9201115-9, 4.43 ERA, 1.34 WHIP, 195 IP, 174 Ks
14-9, 2.53 ERA, 1.02 WHIP, 227.2 IP, 229 Ks201216-7, 3.74 ERA, 1.27 WHIP, 187.2 IP, 231 Ks, 11.1 K/9
16-9, 1.83 ERA, 0.91 WHIP, 236 IP, 232 Ks201321-3, 2.90 ERA, 0.97 WHIP, 214.1 IP, 240 Ks
21-3, 1.77 ERA, 0.85 WHIP, 198 IP, 239 Ks201418-5, 3.15 ERA, 1.17 WHIP, 220.1 IP, 252 Ks
16-7, 2.13 ERA, 0.88 WHIP, 232.2 IP, 301 Ks201514-12, 2.79 ERA, 0.91 WHIP, 228.2 IP, 276 Ks
12-4, 1.69 ERA, 0.72 WHIP, 149 IP, 172 Ks201620-7, 2.96 ERA, 0.96 WHIP, 228.1 IP, 284 Ks
18-4, 2.31 ERA, 0.94 WHIP, 175 IP, 202 Ks201716-6, 2.51 ERA, 0.90 WHIP, 200.2 IP, 268 Ks
9-5, 2.73 ERA, 1.04 WHIP, 161.1 IP, 155 Ks201818-7, 2.53 ERA, 0.91 WHIP, 220.2 IP, 300 Ks
16-5, 3.03 ERA, 1.04 WHIP, 178.1 IP, 189 Ks201911-7, 2.92 ERA, 1.02 WHIP, 172.1 IP, 243 Ks
6-2, 2.16 ERA, 0.84 WHIP, 58.1 IP, 62 Ks20205-4, 3.74 ERA, 1.38 WHIP, 67.1 IP, 92 Ks
10-8, 3.55 ERA, 1.01 WHIP, 121.2 IP, 144 Ks202115-4, 2.46 ERA, 0.86 WHIP, 179.1 IP, 236 Ks
12-3, 2.28 ERA, 0.94 WHIP, 126.1 IP, 137 Ks202211-5, 2.29 ERA, 0.90 WHIP, 145 IP, 173 Ks

Amongst the plethora of numbers between the two listed above, a handful of them were of note:

  • Kershaw has never had a losing season
  • From 2009 to 2016, Kershaw posted a lower ERA and WHIP than Scherzer
  • Kershaw produced five straight seasons with a WHIP under 1.000 (2013-2017)
  • After the 2011 season, Scherzer would average at least 10 Ks per 9 innings for the rest of his career
  • Scherzer produced 4 straight seasons (2015-2019) with a WHIP below 1.000 and 250+ Ks
  • Kershaw has eight seasons with a WHIP under 1.000, to Scherzer’s seven
  • Kershaw has 7 seasons with an ERA lower than 2.29, which is Scherzer’s lowest in a season (2022)
  • Since 2012, Scherzer has 533 more strikeouts (2,595) than Kershaw (2,062)

Filthy, filthy stuff from both of them. Winning records everywhere, WHIPs and ERAs lower than my checking account balance, dump-truck full amounts of innings pitched, and a warehouse full of strikeouts.

The biggest difference between the two however, has to be Kershaw’s ERAs over the years. Which is truly something else. In certain years his ERA was nearly half of what Scherzer’s was. A staggering eight seasons with an ERA under 2.50 for Kershaw. 3 of them under 2.00. While Max only has two seasons with an ERA under 2.50 to his name, both not coming until after the COVID-shortened season of 2020 (2021 & 2022).

Advantage on surrendering runs? Kershaw, easily.

Mad Max’s advantage in all this? Of course, the strikeouts

K’s for days, leading the league for three straight years from ’16 to ’18. Those three years being a part of a 5-year span in which he produced 250+ strikeouts. Matched up to Kershaw’s one season in which he struck out 250+, Scherzer gets himself on the advantage board in the K department

The innings pitched is more of a push here. Though it is important to make note of it because innings pitched are essentially outs, and that’s what it’s all about for a pitcher. Kershaw churning his pitching milage more early in his career, with Max logging his big work shifts a bit later in his career.

The Career Comparison

KershawCareer StatScherzer
197-87W-L201-102
.694W-L%.663
2.48ERA3.11
777Runs998
2,581IP2,682
25CG12
15SHO5
1955Hits2180
6.8H Per 97.3
629Walks701
2.2Walks Per 92.4
206HRs300
0.7HR Per 91.0
2807Ks3193
9.8K Per 910.7
1.00WHIP1.07
39HBP107

The Verdict

Cooperstown bound career numbers from both men. We’re going to go look at other players stat lines after this and think everyone else is just average.

However, this is a Career Comparison. A heavyweight bout one in that. If we’re being truthful here, all evidence points to Kershaw in this one. To have that big a gap in runs surrendered, with just a tick over 100 innings between them, shows Clayton’s elite stinginess on the mound is on a completely different level.

Fewer hits. Fewer homers. fewer walks. hit a whole lot less batters. Doubling Max in complete games and tripling him in shutouts

in what seems to be a neck & neck matchup just going off the names, there’s no doubt that, by some distance, our winner in this contest, is The Claw, Clayton Kershaw.